Dendropsophus ebraccatus Cope 1874
Pantless Treefrog, Hourglass Treefrog, Harlequin Treefrog, Clown Treefrog
Eggs of D. ebraccatus are typically laid on vegetation overhanging ponds, but sometimes D. ebraccatus lay eggs aquatically. Dendropsophus ebraccatus is the only known vertebrate to exhibit reproductive mode plasticity (Touchon and Warkentin 2008a).
Species description based on Duellman (1970), Duellman (2001) and Savage (2002).
Small, yellow treefrogs. Dendropsophus ebraccatus exhibits sexual dimorphism. Males are smaller than females: males to 28 mm; females to 37 mm. Snout-vent length, head width and tympanic membranes are all larger in females but laryngeal components are larger in males (McClelland et. al. 1993). An extensive description of the adults and tadpoles can be found in Duellman (2001).
Dorsal coloration changes from vibrant yellow at night to pale yellow or cream during the day. Many specimens have a brown stripe running laterally from the tip of the snout through the eyes to the rear of the head. Dorsal surface with variable dark brown markings. Duellman (1970) recognized four dorsal patterns: plain, spotted, triangle, or hour-glass. Intermediate patterns have not been observed. The dorsal skin is smooth.
Thighs are uniformly yellow with no bright coloration in the concealed portions.
Iris brown to reddish bronze, sometimes tan or yellow. Pupil horizontal.
Foot moderately to extensively webbed. Toes with large terminal discs.
Dendropsophus microcephalus has three of brown lines running laterally down the back. Dendropsophus phlebodes has brown dashes or interconnected lines on dorsal surface, often forming a faint X shape. Both D. microcephalus and D. phelobodes lack a light spot below the eye (Savage 2002).
The breeding season is largely concordant with the rainy season. In Panama, the breeding season lasts roughly from May to November (Fouquette 1960) or even January (Duellman 1970), depending on the duration of the rainy season. Large breeding choruses form at the edges of marshes and ponds. For females, time between reproductive bouts may be a little as 10 days (Wells 2007).
Dendropsophus ebraccatus lay relatively large clutches of small eggs (Wells 2007); however the number of eggs per clutch is quite variable (Duellman 1970, Roberts 1994, Savage 2002). Eggs are laid terrestrially on leaves overhanging water (Duellman 1970). In Gamboa, Panama,eggs may are laid aquatically onto submerged or floating vegetation (Touchon and Warkentin 2009). Mutiple clutches of eggs are laid by a single female in a night (Touchon and Warkentin 2008). Undisturbed eggs hatch in approximately 3 ½ days.
Tadpoles develop in ponds where they can often be dipnetted from aquatic vegetation or leaf litter on the bottom (Touchon pers. comm.). Tadpole bodies are mostly dark brown flecked with gold above, with a prominent black eye bar. The ventral surface is white. Tadpoles have large pigmented areas on the tail and develop bright red coloration in the presence of aquatic invertebrate predators (Touchon and Warkentin 2008a). Unlike species that are adapted to more ephemeral larval habitats, D. ebraccatus tadpoles cannot survive for very long out of water (Valerio 1971).
Metamorphs emerge in as little as 6 weeks but duration of the larval stage varies considerably depending on pond temperatures (Touchon pers. comm.). Time to maturity and lifespan in the wild are unknown.
Ecology behavior and evolution
Adult diet is unknown. Presumably adults eat small arthropods. Tadpoles are mainly macrophagous herbivores but will also scavenge dead tadpoles (Touchon pers. comm.).
Eggs are eaten by a wide variety invertebrate and vertebrate predators, including wasps, ants, tadpoles, turtles and snakes (Roberts 1994, Donnelly and Guyer 1994, Touchon pers. comm.). Eggs are also extremely vulnerable to dessication if they are not rained on, which negatively impacts egg survival and development and leads to altered interactions with egg and larval predators (Touchon and Warkentin 2009). Tadpoles are consumed by a wide variety of invertebrate and vertebrate predators such as fish, giant water bugs, and dragonfly nymphs (Touchon and Vonesh pers. comm.) Juveniles and adults have been observed being attacked by large spiders (Touchon pers. comm, Bernal pers. comm.). Adult D. ebbracatus have been found infected with helminth (Goldberg and Bursey 2008) and trematode (Guillen-Hernandez et al 2000) parasites.
A prolonged "wreek" or "creek" followed by zero to several "eeks" (Guyer and Donelly 2005, Ibanez et al 1999). Some species of frogs emit rain calls in the daytime during or before rain showers. The rain call of D. ebraccatus sounds like the short primary note of the mating call (Duellman 1970).
Behavior and communication
Dendropsophus ebraccatus has been described as a lek-breeding anuran (Wells 2007). Both calling perches and oviposition sites used by D. ebraccatus tend to be lower than those of a common heterospecific that also lays eggs terrestrially, Agalychnis callidryas (Donnelly and Guyer 1994). Calling by D. ebraccatus can be inhibited by calling of Dendropsophus microcephalus and Dendropsophus phlebodes (Schwartz and Wells 1983). Dendropsophus ebraccatus calling is also influenced by the calls of Scinax boulengeri due to the complete overlap in the two species' frequency ranges (Wells 2007). When multiple individuals or species are calling together at ponds, D. ebraccatus will synchronize the timing of their calls to minimize overlap (Schwartz and Wells 1984a). Dendropsophus ebraccatus also produces aggressive calls towards con- and heterospecifics (Schwartz and Wells 1985). Aggressive calls are graded in their intensity (Wells and Schwartz 1984a), and males respond more strongly to aggressive calls of increasing intensity (Wells 1989). Males lower their aggressive thresholds in response to aggressive calls, further contributing to high levels of aggressive calling observed in this species (Reichert Early Online). Calling is relatively energetically inexpensive for D. ebraccatus compared to other species with higher calling rates (Bevier 1995, 1997).
Females do not necessarily prefer larger males (Morris 1991), although females do prefer calls of certain frequencies (Schwartz and Wells 1994a) as well as calls with higher pulse rates and more pulses (Wells 2007). However, large choruses and calls of heterospecifics interfere with a female's ability to assess male calls, and female preference for certain frequencies breaks down in the presence of background noise (Schwartz and Wells 1984a, Ehret & Gerhardt 1980, Gerhardt and Klump 1988a, Wollerman 1999, Wollerman and Wiley 2002a). Miyamoto and Cane (1980b) provide an excellent description of pair formation in D. ebraccatus, which has pectoral (i.e., axillary) amplexus. Silent males found near calling males will attempt to intercept females approaching calling males (Miyamoto and Cane 1980a).
2N = 30 (Duellman and Cole 1965, Kaiser et al 1996).
Ohmer et al (2009) found divergence in body size, colour pattern frequencies, and male advertisement call among genetically distinct populations of D. ebraccatus in Panama and Costa Rica. Patterns of genetic and phenotypic variation differ from those of Agalychnis callidryas (Robertson 2008, Robertson et al 2009).
The vocal sac of D. ebraccatus is not a cavity resonator (Rand and Dudley 1993). Anatomical differences among D. ebraccatus and D. microcephalus may contribute to reproductive isolation. Differences in male traits among these two species contribute to the production of species-typical calls (Wylcinski et al 1993). Likewise, differences in ear anatomy in females alter the 'best excitatory frequency' that each species can detect (McClelland et al 1993). Unlike species adapted to higher elevations, D. ebraccatus reduces calling rates at higher temperatures (Navas 1996a) and reduces activity at lower temperatures (Navas 1996b).
Taxonomy and systematics
Hyla ebraccata, Hyla weyerae
Latin: e = without braccat = trouser
"region of Nicaragua" (Dunn and Stuart 1951)
Dendropsophus ebraccatus belongs to the 30 chromosome Hyla, a group of little yellow treefrogs with 30 chromosomes. Faivovich et al. (2005) removed the genus Dendropsophus from the synonymy of Hyla and placed D. ebraccatus within the Dendropsophus luecophyllatus species group.
Habitat and distribution
HabitatHumid, lowland forest to 1600 m. This species may also occur in areas that have been cut extensively (Duellman 1970). Adults most likely live in the forest canopy, although some individuals have been found in leaf litter in the buttresses of trees (Whitfield and Pierce 2005). Individuals have also been found in bromeliads (Duellman 1970). During the breeding season, individuals may be found on vegetation near ponds, marshes, and temporarilly flooded areas at night.
Belize, Columbia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama
Distrubution map (IUCN)
Altig, R. 1987. Key to the Anuran Tadpoles of Mexico. The Southwestern Naturalist 32(1): 75-84
Altig, R. 2006. Discussions of the origin and evolution of the oral apparatus of anuran tadpoles. Acta Herpetologica 1(2): 95-105
Backwell, PRY and MD Jennions. 1993. Mate choice in the Neotropical frog, Hyla ebraccata - Sexual selection, mate recognition and signal selection. Animal Behaviour 45: 1248-1250
Bevier, CR. 1995. Biochemical correlates of calling activity in neotropical frogs. Physiological Zoology 68: 1118-1142
Bevier, CR. 1997. Utilization of energy substrates during calling activity in tropical forests. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41: 343-352
Chek, AA, SC Lougheed, JP Bogart, and PT Boag. 2001. Perception and history: Molecular phylogeny of a diverse group of Neotropical frogs, the 30-chromosome Hyla (Anura : Hylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18: 370-385
Cope, ED. 1874. Description of some species of reptiles obtained by Dr. John F. Bransford, Assistant Surgeon United States Navy, while attached to the Nicaraguan surveying expedition in 1873. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia: 69
Donnelly, MA, and C Guyer. 1994. Patterns of reproduction and habitat use in an assemblage of Neotropical hylid frogs. Oecologia 98:291-302
Duellman, WE and RA Pyles. 1983. Acoustic resource partitioning in anuran communities. Copeia 1983: 639-649
Duellman, WE. 1970. The Hylid Frogs of Middle America. Monographs of the Museum of Natural History University of Kansas.
Duellman, WE. 2001. The Hylid Frogs of Middle America. 2nd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Ithaca, New York.
Duellman, WE and CJ Cole. 1965. Studies of chromosomes of some anuran amphibians (Hylidae and Centrolenidae). Systematic Zoology 14(2): 139-143
Duellman, WE. 1966. The Central American herpetofauna: an ecological perspective. Copeia 1966(4): 700-719
Duellman, WE. 1967. Courtship isolating mechanisms in Costa Rican hylid frogs. Herpetologica 23(3): 169-183
Dunn, ER. 1931. New frogs from Panama and Costa Rica. Occasional Papers of the Boston Society of Natural History: 385–401
Faivovich, J, CFB Haddad, PCO Garcia, DR Frost, JA Campbell, and WC Wheeler. 2005. Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: Phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History: 1-240
Fouquette Jr., MJ. 1960. Isolating mechanisms in three sympatric treefrogs in the Canal Zone. Evolution 14: 484-497
Fugler, CM and RG Webb. 1957. Some noteworthy reptiles and amphibians from the states of Oaxaca and Veracruz. Herpetologica 13(2): 103-108
Goldberg, SR and CR Bursey. 2008. Helminths from fifteen species of frogs (Anura, Hylidae) from Costa Rica. Phyllomedusa 7(1): 25-33
Guillen-Hernandez, S, G Salgado-Maldonado, and R Lamothe-Argumedo. 2000. Digeneans (Plathelminthes : Trematoda) of seven sympatric species of anurans from Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and the Environment 35(1): 10-13
Hawley, TJ. 2009. The ecological significance and incidence of intraguild predation and cannibalism among anurans in ephemeral tropical pools. Copeia 2009(4): 748–757
Heyer, WR. 1967. A herpetofaunal study of an ecological transect through the Cordillera de Tilarán, Costa Rica. Copeia 1967(2): 259-271
Ibañez, R, AS Rand, and CA Jaramillo. 1999. Los anfibios del Monumento Natural Barro Colorado, Parque Nacional Soberanía y areas adyacentes. Mizrachi, E. and Pujol, S.A., Santa Fe de Bogota
Ibáñez, R, F Solís, C Jaramillo, and AS Rand. 2000. An overwiew of the herpetology of Panama. In: Johnson, J.D., Webb, R.G. and Flores-Villela, O.A. (eds), Mesoamerican Herpetology: Systematics, Zoogeography and Conservation, pp. 159-170. The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas
Kaiser, H, C Mais, F Bolanos, C Steinlein, W Feichtinger, and M Schmid. 1996. Chromosomal investigation of three Costa Rican frogs from the 30-chromosome radiation of Hyla with the description of a unique geographic variation in nucleolus organizer regions. Genetica 98(1): 95-102
Köhler, G. 2001. Anfibios y Reptiles de Nicaragua. Herpeton, Offenbach, Germany.
Langebartel, DA and PW Smith. 1959. Noteworthy records of amphibians and reptiles from eastern Mexico. Herpetologica 15(1): 27-29
Laurencio, D. 2009. Amphibians and reptiles from Reserva Natural Absoluta Cabo Blanco, province of Puntarenas, Costa Rica. Check List 5(3): 446–459
Laurencio, D and JH Malone. 2009. The Amphibians and reptiles of Parque Nacional Carara, a transitional herpetofaunal assemblage in Costa Rica. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 4(1): 120-131
Lee, JC. 1996. The amphibians and reptiles of the Yucatán Peninsula. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA
Lynch, JD. 2006 The tadpoles of frogs and toads found in the lowlands of northern Colombia. Rev. Acad. Colom. Cienc. 30 (116): 443-45
Martin, AA and GF Watson. 1971. Life history as an aid to generic delimitation in the family Hylidae. Copeia 1971(1): 78-89
McClelland, BE, W Wilczynski, and AS Rand. 1997. Sexual dimorphism and species differences in the neurophysiology and morphology of the acoustic communication system of two neotropical hylids. Journal of Comparative Physiology A-Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology 180:451-462
McCranie, JR and LD Wilson. 2002. The amphibians of Honduras. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Ithaca, New York, USA
Miyamoto, MM and JH Cane. 1980a. Behavioral observations of non-calling males in Costa Rican Hyla ebraccata. Biotropica 12: 225-227
Miyamoto, MM and JH Cane. 1980b. Notes on the reproductive behavior of a Costa Rican population of Hyla ebraccata. Copeia 1980:928-930
Morales, M, A Ortiz, E Toral, and J Regalado. 2002. Monitoreo del aprovechamiento forestal con especies indicadoras de herpetofaunaen el Chocó ecuatoriano, Esmeraldas, Ecuador. Componente de monitoreo biológico, Proyecto SUBIR-CARE. Informe Final Fase III, pp. 104-161. EcoCiencia, Quito, Ecuador
Morris, MR. 1991. Female choice of large males in the treefrog Hyla ebraccata. Journal of Zoology 223: 371-378
Navas, CA. 1996a. The effect of temperature on the vocal activity of tropical anurans: a comparison of high and low-elevation species. Journal of Herpetology 30: 488-497
Navas, CA. 1996b. Metabolic physiology, locomotor performance, and thermal niche breadth in neotropical anurans. Physiological Zoology 69: 1481-1501
Ohmer, ME, JM Robertson, and K Zamudio. 2009. Discordance in body size, colour pattern, and advertisement call across genetically distinct populations in a Neotropical anuran (Dendropsophus ebraccatus). Bological Journal of the Linnean Society 97(2): 298-313
Rand, AS and R Dudley. 1993. Frogs in helium: the anuran vocal sac is not a cavity resonator. Physiological Zoology 66(5): 793-806
Reichart, MS. Early Online. Aggressive thresholds in Dendropsophus ebraccatus: habituation and sensitization to different call types. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Ressel, SJ. 1996. Ultrastructural properties of muscles used for call production in neotropical frogs. Physiological Zoology 69: 952-973
Roberts, WE. 1994. Evolution and ecology of arboreal egg-laying frogs. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Robertson JM. 2008. Genetic and phenotypic diversity patterns in two polymorphic, neotropical anurans: biogeography, gene flow and selection. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Robertson, JM, C Duryea, and K Zamudio. 2009. Discordant patterns of evolutionary differentiation in two Neotropical treefrogs. Molecular Ecology 18(7): 1375-1395
Ruiz-Carranza, PM, MC Ardila-Robayo, and JD Lynch. 1996. Lista actualizada de la fauna de Amphibia de Colombia. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales: 365-415
Santos-Barrera, G, J Pacheco, F Mendoza-Quijano, F Bolaños, G Cháves, GC Daily, PR Ehrlich and G Ceballos. 2008. Diversity, natural history and conservation of amphibians and reptiles from the San Vito Region, southwestern Costa Rica. International Journal of Tropical Biology 56(2): 755-778
Savage, JM and F Bolaños. 2009a. A checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of Costa Rica: additions and nomenclatural revisions. Zootaxa 2005:1-23
Savage, JM. 2002. The Amphibians and Reptiles of Costa Rica: a herpetofauna between two continents, between two seas. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Savage, JM and WR Heyer. 1969. The tree frog (family Hylidae) of Costa Rica: diagnosis and distribution. Revista de Biología Tropical: 1-27
Savage, JM. 1973. Herpetological collections made by Dr. John F. Bransford, Assistant Surgeon, U.S.N. during the Nicaragua and Panama Canal surveys (1872-1885). Journal of Herpetology 7(1): 35-38
Schlaepfer, MA and TA Gavin. 2001. Edge Effects on Lizards and Frogs in Tropical Forest Fragments. Conservation Biology 15(4): 1079-1090
Schwartz, JJ and KD Wells. 1983. The influence of background noise on the behavior of a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata. Herpetologica 39: 121-129.
Schwartz, JJ and KD Wells. 1984. Interspecific acoustic interactions of the neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 14: 211-224.
Schwartz, JJ and KD Wells. 1984b. Vocal Behavior of the Neotropical Treefrog Hyla phlebodes. Herpetologica 40(4): 452-463.
Touchon, JC and KM Warkentin. 2008a. Reproductive mode plasticity: aquatic and terrestrial oviposition in a treefrog. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 7495-7499
Touchon, JC and KM Warkentin. 2008b. Fish and dragonfly nymph predators induce opposite shifts in color and morphology of tadpoles. Oikos 117: 634-640
Touchon, JC and KM Warkentin. 2009. Negative synergism of rainfall patterns and predators affects frog egg survival. Journal of Animal Ecology 78: 715-723
Touchon, JT and KM Warkentin. Early Online. Short- and long-term effects of the abiotic egg environment on viability, development and vulnerability to predators of a Neotropical anuran. Functional Ecology
Urbina-Cardona, JN, M Olivares-Perez, and VH Reynoso. 2006. Herpetofauna diversity and microenvironment correlates across a pasture–edge–interior ecotone in tropical rainforest fragments in the Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve of Veracruz, Mexico. Biological Conservation 132: 61-75
Valerio, CE. 1971. Ability of some tropical tadpoles to survive without water. Copeia 1971: 364-365
Villa, J. 1977. A symbiotic relationship between frog (Amphibia, Anura, Centrolenidae) and fly larvae (Drosophilidae). Journal of Herpetology 11(3): 317-322
Wells, KD. 1989. Vocal communication in a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata: responses of males to graded aggressive calls. Copeia 1989: 461-466
Wells, KD and BJ Greer. 1981. Vocal responses to conspecific calls in a neotropical hylid frog, Hyla ebraccata. Copeia 1981: 615-624
Wells, KD and JJ Schwartz. 1984a. Vocal communication in a Neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata: aggressive calls. Behaviour 91:128-145
Wells, KD and JJ Schwartz. 1984b. Vocal communication in a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata: advertisement calls. Animal Behaviour 32: 405-420
Wells, KD and KM Bard. 1987. Vocal communication in a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata: responses of females to advertisement and aggressive calls. Behaviour 101: 200-210
Wendler S. 2008. Landei oder Wasserei? Biologie in unserer Zeit 38(4): 216
Whitfield, SM and MSF Pierce. 2005. Tree Buttress Microhabitat Use by a Neotropical Leaf-Litter Herpetofauna. Journal of Herpetology 39(2): 192-198
Whitﬁeld, SM, KE Bell, T Philippi, M Sasa, F Bolanos, G Chaves, JM Savage, and MA Donnelly. 2007. Amphibian and reptile declines over 35 years at La Selva, Costa Rica. PNAS 104(20): 8352– 8356
Wiens, JJ, CH Graham, DS Moen, SA Smith, and TW Reeder 2006. Evolutionary and Ecological Causes of the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient in Hylid Frogs: Treefrog Trees Unearth the Roots of High Tropical Diversity. American Naturalist 168: 579–596.
Wiens, JJ, JW Fetzner Jr., CL Parkinson and TW Reeder. 2005. Hylid Frog Phylogeny and Sampling Strategies for Speciose Clades. Systematic Biology 54(5): 778-807
Wilczynki, W, BE McClelland, and AS Rand. 1993. Acoustic, auditory, and morphological divergence in three species of neotropical frog. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 172: 425-438
Wollerman, L. 1998. Stabilizing and directional preferences of female Hyla ebraccata for calls differing in static properties. Animal Behaviour 55: 1619-1630
Wollerman, L. 1999. Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frog Hyla ebraccata. Animal Behaviour 57: 529-536
Wollerman, L and RH Wiley. 2002a. Background noise from a natural chorus alters female discrimination of male calls in a Neotropical frog. Animal Behaviour 63: 15-22
Wollerman, L and RH Wiley. 2002b. Possibilities for error during communication by neotropical frogs in a complex acoustic environment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 52: 465-473